What is EDI (Electronic Data Interchange)?

EDI (Electronic Data Interchange) sits at the heart of order-to-cash and procure-to-pay, moving purchase orders, invoices, advance ship notices, and inventory updates directly between your ERP, WMS, TMS, and trading partners: no PDFs, no retyping. 

Using standard document sets (like X12 and EDIFACT) and managed transports (AS2, SFTP, or VANs), mature EDI programs cut cycle times, reduce errors and chargebacks, and give you end-to-end traceability across the supply chain.

In this guide, we’ll cover what EDI is, how it works, the most common document types and standards, and how to fold EDI into a modern integration stack alongside APIs and iPaaS.

What is EDI?

Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) is a standardised way for organisations to exchange business documents system-to-system without emails, PDFs, or manual retyping. Instead of a buyer keying a purchase order into a supplier’s portal, the buyer’s ERP generates a structured message, and the supplier’s systems read it automatically. 

Common standards include ANSI X12 and EDIFACT, and common documents span the order-to-cash and procure-to-pay cycle: purchase orders, order acknowledgements, advance ship notices, invoices, inventory updates, and more. 

The goal is speed, accuracy, and traceability across the supply chain, especially in engineering, technical, and industrial environments where volumes are high and mistakes are costly.

How does EDI work?

An internal system (ERP, WMS, TMS, MES) first produces a business document in its native format. An EDI translator maps that record to the agreed standard and version, say X12 850 for a purchase order or EDIFACT ORDERS, applying the trading partner’s specific rules for segments, qualifiers, and codes. The message is then “enveloped” with control headers and trailers so it can be tracked end-to-end, validated for structure and content, and queued for delivery.

Transport happens over managed channels such as AS2, SFTP, or via a value-added network (VAN). With AS2, messages are encrypted and signed; the receiver returns a Message Disposition Notification (MDN) to confirm safe receipt. 

With X12, the receiver often returns a functional acknowledgement (997 or 999) to confirm the file was syntactically valid, while EDIFACT uses CONTRL for a similar purpose. These acknowledgements don’t approve the business content (they simply prove it arrived intact) so most programmes also implement application-level responses (for example, an 855 Purchase Order Acknowledgement).

On receipt, the trading partner’s EDI layer validates, translates the message back into the partner’s internal schema, and posts it into their ERP or WMS. Errors, like unknown item numbers, unit-of-measure mismatches, or missing pack-level details, are routed to exception handling with clear logs and reprocess options. Well-run programmes also align master data (supplier IDs, GLNs/DUNS, SKUs, SSCC labels) so documents reconcile without manual intervention.

Behind the scenes, partner agreements define standards, versions, document sets, schedules, SLAs, security keys/certificates, and test/certification steps. Whether you connect point-to-point, through a VAN, or via an iPaaS, the result is the same: machine-readable transactions that move quickly, reduce chargebacks and keystroke errors, and provide auditable trails across your supply chain.

Types of EDI

EDI comes in a few flavours: document standards, transport methods, and connection models. The mix you choose usually follows your biggest trading partners and industry norms, shaping how each message is formatted, secured, and exchanged.

By document standard

The most common families are ANSI X12 (widely used in North America across retail, manufacturing, and logistics) and EDIFACT (the global UN standard used across Europe and many multinationals). Sector variants include GS1/EANCOM for retail and distribution, VDA and Odette for European automotive, and RosettaNet for high-tech/electronics. Choosing the right standard usually follows your largest trading partners and industry norms.

By transport method

EDI messages move over AS2 (encrypted, signed HTTPS with MDNs for proof of delivery), SFTP/FTPS (managed file transfer), or AS4 (web-services based, common in public procurement networks). OFTP2 remains prevalent in automotive, while some programmes still use VANs (value-added networks) that handle routing, security, and store-and-forward delivery. Many modern ecosystems mix these transports to meet partner and compliance requirements.

By connection model

You can connect direct point-to-point (managing certificates, endpoints, and partner maps yourself), use a VAN/interop network to broker connections, or adopt managed EDI/B2B services where a provider onboards partners, maintains maps, and monitors flows. 

Increasingly, teams run hybrid EDI + API/iPaaS models: EDI for formal trading documents with big retailers and manufacturers, APIs for real-time status, inventory, and event updates, giving engineering, technical, and industrial operations both compliance and agility.

EDI and AI integration

AI makes EDI faster to build and easier to run. During onboarding, models can read partner specs, propose map structures (segments, qualifiers, code lists), and auto-generate transformation rules: speeding up X12/EDIFACT mapping and reducing regression risk when versions change. Where partners aren’t fully EDI-enabled, AI-assisted OCR can lift data from PDFs/emails and standardise it before handing off to your EDI layer, providing a pragmatic bridge without rekeying.

In operations, anomaly detection flags unusual volumes, missing acknowledgements, or schema drift across 850/855/856/810 flows, while predictive models surface chargeback risk, fill-rate issues, and late-delivery likelihood. Agents can triage exceptions, suggest fixes for UOM/SKU mismatches, and perform master-data matching so documents post straight through. Copilot-style chat lets teams query “why did Retailer A reject yesterday’s invoices?” and receive a concise, auditable explanation.

Governance still matters: keep sensitive data protected, log every AI suggestion/change, and use human-in-the-loop approvals for map edits and remediation steps. Combined with APIs and event streams, AI enhances EDI’s reliability and visibility without compromising control.

EDI vs API

Think of EDI as formal, standardised document exchange between businesses, and APIs as flexible, real-time interfaces for data on demand. Both move information system-to-system, but they optimise for different needs.

When EDI makes sense 

EDI is ideal for mandated trading documents (purchase orders, ASNs, invoices), where partners require specific standards (X12/EDIFACT), strict acknowledgements, and auditability. 

It suits high-volume order-to-cash and procure-to-pay processes, helps avoid chargebacks, and aligns well with retailer and distributor requirements over AS2, SFTP, or VANs. In engineering, technical, and industrial supply chains, that reliability and traceability is often non-negotiable.

When APIs shine 

APIs (REST/GraphQL with JSON) excel at near real-time queries and updates that aren’t governed by EDI mandates: stock checks, pricing lookups, shipment status, equipment telemetry, or self-serve portals. They’re lighter to onboard, easier to version, and integrate cleanly with iPaaS and event streams for responsive workflows.

The common hybrid

Most mature programmes run both: EDI for the canonical trading documents and compliance, APIs for real-time visibility and exceptions. For example, keep orders and invoices in EDI, expose shipment milestones and inventory via APIs, and use webhooks or events to trigger internal automations. This blend gives partners the formality they expect and your teams the agility they need without duplicating effort.

Top EDI tools

IBM Sterling B2B Integrator. Enterprise-grade EDI/AS2 with robust mapping, partner onboarding, and high-throughput ops for complex supply chains.

OpenText Trading Grid. Large VAN/network with managed services and tooling for global B2B/EDI at scale.

Cleo Integration Cloud. EDI + API/iPaaS in one; strong for hybrid EDI/API use cases and end-to-end visibility.

Boomi B2B/EDI. iPaaS with trading-partner management and prebuilt components; good for tying EDI into apps and APIs.

MuleSoft Anypoint B2B. EDI module on the MuleSoft platform; suits organisations standardising on Anypoint.

SPS Commerce Fulfilment. Retail-centric network that simplifies retailer/supplier compliance and chargeback reduction.

TrueCommerce. Managed EDI network with mappings and compliance services for manufacturers, distributors, and retailers.

Azure Logic Apps (EDI/AS2). Microsoft-centric pipelines with built-in EDI/AS2 connectors; fits ERP/CRM on Azure.

AWS B2B Data Interchange. Native AWS option for AS2, translations, and partner flows integrated with cloud pipelines.

Jitterbit B2B/EDI. iPaaS with EDI capabilities; handy where you need fast partner onboarding plus application integration.

There are some software platforms that make excellent companions to these EDI tools. Zapier orchestrates notifications, validations, and back-office updates around EDI events. Make.com handles branching ops and webhooks for exception workflows. Airtable works well as a lightweight control tower or exception queue for non-technical teams. Xano provides a nocode backend to expose cleaned EDI data via APIs or to stage partner-facing portals.

Excellence in software integration with flowmondo

EDI delivers its best results when the programme is architected end-to-end. Where it helps, we pair EDI with APIs and light automation, using platforms like Zapier, to surface real-time status, trigger back-office updates, and keep teams in sync.

Whether you’re launching EDI, expanding to new partners, or modernising a legacy translator, we’ll help you reduce chargebacks, shorten cycle times, and strengthen traceability across engineering, technical, and industrial operations. 

For a broader view of how everything fits together, check out our main guide: Software Integration for Modern Businesses.

‍